tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-117970412806233818.post5303126046116893898..comments2024-03-24T12:43:16.575-04:00Comments on Truthbomb : Article: Intuition- A Special Way of Knowing by Greg KouklChadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16449550583016519343noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-117970412806233818.post-20773020133019923572013-08-24T22:55:56.423-04:002013-08-24T22:55:56.423-04:00Koukl puts mathematical truths and the laws of log...<b>Koukl puts mathematical truths and the laws of logic into the same basket...</b><br /><br />He is not alone here.<br /><br />Atheist Michael Ruse states:<br /><br /><i>“The man who says that it is morally acceptable to rape little children is just as mistaken as the man who says, 2+2=5.”</i><br /><br />A great book on this topic is C.S. Lewis's classic <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mere-Christianity-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652926/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1377399164&sr=1-1&keywords=Mere+Christianity" rel="nofollow">Mere Christianity</a> which you can read or listen to online <a href="http://www.truthaccordingtoscripture.com/documents/apologetics/mere-christianity/cs-lewis-mere-christianity-toc.php#.Uhlx1husiSq" rel="nofollow">here.</a><br /><br />RespectfullyChadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16449550583016519343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-117970412806233818.post-47071403422235177742013-08-20T06:32:14.619-04:002013-08-20T06:32:14.619-04:00It's a shame there's no facility to leave ...It's a shame there's no facility to leave comments on that link. <br /><br />Koukl puts mathematical truths and the laws of logic into the same basket as 'things he feels very strongly about' or 'things that evoke a strong reaction'. One cannot even deny a law of logic without contradiction oneself. That's not the same as situations where he can only say "If someone disagrees with that, one can only suggest that person gets help". <br /><br />Further, if Koukl sees 'rape is wrong' as a truth in the same bracket as '1+1=2' – one that requires no justification, that simply could not be any other way, then he cannot also claim that one requires a God to explain it. Even God could not make 1+1=3, after all.Andrew Ryannoreply@blogger.com