tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-117970412806233818.post6372887170065258940..comments2024-03-24T12:43:16.575-04:00Comments on Truthbomb : The Gospel of Jesus' Wife? Chadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16449550583016519343noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-117970412806233818.post-87827806198894788652012-09-24T20:14:16.578-04:002012-09-24T20:14:16.578-04:00Hello bob,
It's nice to hear from you and I h...Hello bob,<br /><br />It's nice to hear from you and I hope you are doing well. <br /><br />I still pray for you and your son who is the armed forces every now and then. I am grateful for his service and hope he is home safe.<br /><br />Take careChadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16449550583016519343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-117970412806233818.post-85360200023408127112012-09-24T13:10:59.352-04:002012-09-24T13:10:59.352-04:00Hi Chad. Been a long time since I visited your bl...Hi Chad. Been a long time since I visited your blog.<br /><br /><i>"Apart from the fact that it is 4th century and therefore a few hundred years after the events..."</i><br />I am guessing, just guessing, that if it was written just 30-50 years after the events, most Christians would still minimize the historical importance of the find because it contradicts what they already believe. So pointing out the time that had passed between the events and the documents creation is pointless and is not helpful in determining whether or not it is true (How many years had passed between the end of the OT and the beginning of the NT).<br /><br /><i>"...many seem to think this is somehow evidence against Christianity."</i><br />I disagree. I have not read or heard of anyone claiming this is "evidence against Christianity". At best, it could be considered evidence against what most Christians currently believe about Jesus, but I don't see how it could be considered as evidence against the religion its self.bobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13742473910850953368noreply@blogger.com