tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-117970412806233818.post8010468468516340989..comments2024-03-24T12:43:16.575-04:00Comments on Truthbomb : The Trinity in Genesis 1:1Chadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16449550583016519343noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-117970412806233818.post-5071817139934605702021-07-13T14:52:19.237-04:002021-07-13T14:52:19.237-04:00Hello Anonymous,
I wanted to thank you for the fe...Hello Anonymous,<br /><br />I wanted to thank you for the feedback. After considering your comment, I have adjusted my conclusion.<br /><br />GodspeedChadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16449550583016519343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-117970412806233818.post-39212504562070695662016-08-16T21:52:16.002-04:002016-08-16T21:52:16.002-04:00While I agree with Nabeel on his grammatical asses...While I agree with Nabeel on his grammatical assessment of Elohim (pl) with the third person singular verb showing the plurality and singularity all in one statement of God, I am not sure it is safe to say that that shows a direct reference to the triune nature of God. Granted we see Elohim as a Plural of Majesty in syntax, and it would be easy to jump to his conclusion. But God's disclosure is gradual through out the Old Testament to the New, and if anything we can draw a conclusion, base on what we know on future passages in the OT and especially in the NT, that this is only an indirect reference to the Trinity and not a direct reference. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com