"Why should a bunch of atoms have thinking ability? Why should I, even as I wrote now, be able to reflect on what I am doing and why should you, even as you read now, be able to ponder my points, agreeing or disagreeing, with pleasure or pain, deciding to refute me or deciding that I am just not worth the effort? No one, certainly not the Darwinian as such, seems to have an answer to this...The point is that there is no scientific answer." [1]
Do you agree with Ruse? What do you think the best explanation of consciousness is? Share below in the comments!
Courage and Godspeed,
Chad
Do you agree with Ruse? What do you think the best explanation of consciousness is? Share below in the comments!
Courage and Godspeed,
Chad
Footnote:
As quoted by Lee Strobel, The Case for the Creator, p. 247.
Comments
Yes, there are many ramifications and detailed questions to discuss. If you passionately wish to agree with Ruse, you can stop now, but if you wish to understand what thought is and how the mind works, you should keep digging! The scientific answers exist, and they are not too hard to understand, as long as you honestly want to understand.
You have presented two pathways of thinking:
1. Think that thought is immaterial and stop investigating the workings of the mind.
or
2. Think that thought is possibly made of physical stuff moving through the brain and investigate the workings of the mind further.
When considering these options, is the brain instructing itself which path to take or is something outside of the brain instructing the brain which path to take? In other words, is the brain thinking over the path to choose or is something outside of the brain thinking over the path to choose?