Brian Auten and I had the pleasure of interviewing Dr. Jonathan McLatchie yesterday about his objections to presuppositional apologetics for a forthcoming episode of the Apologetics315 Podcast. During the interview, Dr. McLatchie mentioned a passed dialogue he participated in on apologetic methodology. I remembered watching it and wanted to feature it here. The representatives for each view are as follows:
Classical Apologetics - Dr. Richard Howe
Reformed Epistemology - Dr. Randal Rauser
This is a very informative dialogue and a great introduction to the varying apologetic methods.
This is a very informative dialogue and a great introduction to the varying apologetic methods.
Enjoy!
Courage and Godspeed,
Chad
Related Posts
Video: Defending Jesus' Resurrection with David Wood and Jonathan McLatchie
Featured Resource: TalkAboutDoubts.com
Video Debate: Mike Licona vs. Richard Howe- What Does It Mean to Say the Bible is Inerrant?
Philosopher Randal Rauser on Apologetics
Debate Video: Does the Bible Misquote Jesus?- Bart Ehrman vs. James White
Related Posts
Video: Defending Jesus' Resurrection with David Wood and Jonathan McLatchie
Featured Resource: TalkAboutDoubts.com
Video Debate: Mike Licona vs. Richard Howe- What Does It Mean to Say the Bible is Inerrant?
Philosopher Randal Rauser on Apologetics
Debate Video: Does the Bible Misquote Jesus?- Bart Ehrman vs. James White
Comments