"The long and the short of it is that I became convinced that atheism implies amorality; and since I am an atheist, I must therefore embrace amorality. I call the premise of this argument 'hard atheism.' ... A 'soft atheist' would hold that one could be an atheist and still believe in morality. And indeed, the whole crop of 'New Atheists' are softies of this kind. So was I, until I experienced my shocking epiphany that the religious fundamentalists are correct: without God, there is no morality. But they are incorrect, I still believe, about there being a God. Hence, I believe, there is no morality."1
Courage and Godspeed,
Chad
Footnote:
1. Joel Marks, "An Amoral Manifesto I," Philosophy Now 80 (August/September 2010): 30 as quoted by Abdu H. Murray in Grand Central Question.
Related Posts
The First Premise of the Moral Argument
Counterpoints: Alvin Plantinga and Michael Ruse on Morality
Video: God and Arguments from Morality by Chad A. Gross
Courage and Godspeed,
Chad
Footnote:
1. Joel Marks, "An Amoral Manifesto I," Philosophy Now 80 (August/September 2010): 30 as quoted by Abdu H. Murray in Grand Central Question.
Related Posts
The First Premise of the Moral Argument
Counterpoints: Alvin Plantinga and Michael Ruse on Morality
Video: God and Arguments from Morality by Chad A. Gross
Comments