Chapter Two: The Victory of Christianity
On page
35, Dr. Keller points out that Cicero taught that the main task of philosophy
is to teach us how to face death.
Because of this, there are some important questions we must answer. What do we desire above everything else? Is it not to be understood, loved and not
alone. Therefore we do not want to die
or have our loved ones die on us. What
is it that primarily gives your life meaning?
Isn’t it the relationships with the ones you love? Do you honestly have no fear of a future that
will strip you of all you hold dear? Honest
people understand that death and its consequences is the problem. Because
science cannot help us find purpose, it cannot help us with suffering. It can tell us what is, but never what ought
to be. That is the purview of philosophy
and “faith”.
For the
Stoics, the Logos was the divine
rational structure of the universe. They
had three ways of facing suffering and death.
First, accept and embrace what the world sent you because it is the providential
and beneficent working of God. The
second was to give reason preeminence over emotion. By avoiding excessive attachments, we can
minimize the overwhelming pain and suffering they bring. Finally, we do not cease to exist upon death,
but transform from one state to another.
Because life is a loan from nature and can be recalled at any time, it
is reasonable to accept this for that is our only choice. Sorrow should be modest and with no positive
function, grief is useless.
For
Eastern cultures, the material world is all an illusion. In Hinduism, it is called maya.
There is no evil, no good, no individuals, no material world. All is part of the One, the All-Soul, the
Absolute Spirit and nothing is outside of it.
Prince
Siddhartha Gautama lived a secure, secluded life until he left the wealth and
luxury of his palace and witnessed the “Four Distressing Sights” – a sick man,
an old man, a dead man and a poor man.
He abandoned his life of security and achieved “enlightenment” and
developed the Four Noble Truths, 1 – all life is suffering, 2 – the cause of
suffering is desire or craving, 3 – suffering ends when craving is extinguished
and 4 – this can only be achieved by following the Eightfold Path to
enlightenment which includes right views, intentions, speech, conduct,
livelihood, effort, mindfulness and meditation.
The
early Christians argued that Christianity’s teachings made more sense of
suffering and the lives of the Christians proved it as evidenced in how they
faced the enormous persecution of the Romans.
Why were Christians so different?
They had a greater source of hope – the resurrection. That is our future. Our person is sustained and perfected after
death. The Logos was not an abstract principal, it is a person – Jesus Christ
– who we can know and love.
Tears
and cries are natural and good and bathed in hope. Ultimate reality is known not only through
reason, but also through relationship. Also,
Christianity does not teach us to love things less, but to love God more. When God is our greatest love, we can face
all things with peace. Love and hope
season our sorrow. God is our heavenly
Father who cares for us and is present to guide and protect us.
The
victory of Christianity is the resurrection.
Jesus is alive in a physical body and will redeem and resurrect our
physical bodies as well. Therefore, this
material life is good and worth enjoying.
Life is irreversible. Youth,
childhood, loved ones will be gone and cannot come back. Christianity doesn’t just offer consolation
in a heavenly bliss, but we get our lives and our bodies back beyond our
greatest hopes and imaginations.
St.
(Pope) Gregory the Great (540-604) rejected the ideas that suffering was
illusion or capricious fate. Rather we
are in the hands of a wise God and should like Job suffer patiently. He also rejected the moralism of karma, that
our suffering is proportional to our sins.
While suffering in general is results from our sin, specific sin does
not result in particular suffering. Some
suffering is to chastise or correct wrongs, prevent future wrongs, or simply to
lead to loving God for Himself alone and experience true peace and freedom.
After
Gregory, there was a significant shift in the belief that “the appropriate
response to [suffering] was to endure it patiently and thus, with the help of
divine grace, to merit heaven…” Accepting
suffering with patience eliminates sin debt and earns God’s favor and admission
into eternal bliss. This emphasis points
away from earlier Christian teaching into a more pagan expression, a kind of
“Christianized Stoicism.”
Martin Luther
rejected the medieval view of salvation as a gradual process of growth in
virtue that eventually merited eternal life.
Instead, he saw salvation as coming through faith, and faith not
primarily as an inner quality of purity but as “an essentially receptive
capacity. Faith is trust in the promise
of God, the means by which we take hold of salvation as a free gift through Christ’s
saving work, not our own.” We can
contribute nothing to our own salvation.
If we are saved by our own virtue, state of heart or good works then we increase
uncertainty and insecurity into our lives.
When we understand we are accepted and righteous in God’s sight solely by grace we are free from the burdens of proving ourselves, fear of the future and fear of our ultimate destiny. This is the most liberating idea and enables us to face suffering because of the cross. Luther stated, “It is God’s nature to make something out of nothing; hence one who is not yet nothing, out of him God cannot make anything,” and “therefore God accepts only the forsaken, cures only the sick, gives sight only to the blind, restores life only to the dead, sanctifies only the sinner, gives wisdom only to the unwise. In short, He has mercy only on those who are wretched.”
When we understand we are accepted and righteous in God’s sight solely by grace we are free from the burdens of proving ourselves, fear of the future and fear of our ultimate destiny. This is the most liberating idea and enables us to face suffering because of the cross. Luther stated, “It is God’s nature to make something out of nothing; hence one who is not yet nothing, out of him God cannot make anything,” and “therefore God accepts only the forsaken, cures only the sick, gives sight only to the blind, restores life only to the dead, sanctifies only the sinner, gives wisdom only to the unwise. In short, He has mercy only on those who are wretched.”
For
first century Jews, the Messiah would defeat Rome and lead Israel to
independence. A weak, suffering,
crucified Messiah made no sense. Looking
at the cross, one could not see the greatest act of salvation in history. Seeing only darkness and pain, God cannot
possibly work through that. But they do
not realize that He could save others by not saving Himself. In one stroke, the justice of the law is
fulfilled and the forgiveness of the lawbreakers is secured, God’s love and
justice are satisfied. In dying, he ends
death. In weakness and suffering, sin is
atoned. It is the only way to end evil
without ending us.
Today we
live in a world that is viewed as entirely natural, there is no supernatural,
it is an “immanent frame”. We are
“buffered selves”, bounded and self-contained.
We determine who we are and what we will be. There is no need to look outside ourselves to
know how to live. We master the meanings
of ourselves and stake our claim as the legislators of our own meaning. There is no longer any humility about our
ability to understand the universe. We
take responsibility of our own lives, create our own happiness, build our own
strength, we are the engine of our own momentum.
Deism
arose from the elites of the 18th century. God exists but is distant and cannot be
known. Our purpose is not to love,
worship and obey him or to seek his forgiveness when we fail. Instead, we are to use our reason and free
will to support human flourishing. The
Lisbon earthquake of 1755 provided the greatest argument for thinkers like
Voltaire against the existence of the loving Biblical God. Prior to this time, the impossibility of
God’s existence was not questioned because of evil. Previously, we were humble enough to admit
that if suffering occurred, just because we couldn’t think of any good reason
for it that there couldn’t be any. But
in the 18th century, thinkers began to believe that because of
reason, we could eventually understand everything.
Another
result of Deistic thought was that we came to believe that we were no longer
created by God for his benefit, but that he created the world for ours. But if the world is created for our benefit,
then evil becomes a much bigger problem.
The skeptical conclusion is inherent in the premises.
American
culture remained characterized by Christian beliefs due to several spiritual
“awakenings” despite the deism of founders such as Jefferson and Franklin. Inherent human sinfulness continued to
explain evil in both moral and natural forms.
But eventually, liberal individualism achieved its pinnacle and we came
to see ourselves in control of our destiny, able to discern right and wrong and
that God is obligated to benefit us if we live a good life in accordance with
our own standards. Sociologist Christian
Smith calls this “moralistic, therapeutic deism.” Many who hold this belief consider themselves
believers in God or even Christians. Yet
this may be the worst possible condition within which to encounter
suffering. If God exists for us, then
natural evil offends us. If we are not
sinners in need of salvation by pure grace, then natural evil confounds us.
Christianity
provides four doctrines that provide powerful assets greater than what secular
culture can provide. 1 – God is
personal, wise, infinite, inscrutible and controls the affairs of the world. 2 – Jesus, God incarnate, came to earth and
suffered with us and for us. God is not
remote and uninvolved. 3 – Faith in
Christ’s work on the cross provides assurance of salvation, much more
comforting than karma. 4 – Bodily
resurrection. It provides not just
consolation, but restoration. It is the
reversal of what seems irreversible.
Atheist
writer Susan Jacoby wrote that “when I see homeless people shivering in the
wake of a deadly storm, when the news media bring me almost obscenely close to
the raw grief of bereft parents, I do not have to ask, as all people of faith
must, why an all-powerful, all-good God allows such things to happen.” But if you don’t believe in God, there is no
reason to struggle with the question of why life is unjust. It just is unjust – deal with it. So atheism frees you from the theodicy
problem (see Chapter One). But theodicy
is not the result of a strong faith, but a weak faith. The larger we get in our own eyes, the less
dependent we become on God’s grace and revelation, the more sure we become of understanding
the universe and how history should progress, the less tolerable suffering
becomes. Theism and deism without
assurance of salvation or resurrection become more disillusioning than
atheism. “When suffering, believing in
God thinly or in the abstract is worse than not believing in God at all.”
Next week Chapter Three: The
Challenge of the Secular.
Until then don't take my word for it, read the book - don’t
wait for the movie,
and have a little hope on me,
and have a little hope on me,
Roger
To learn more about Timothy Keller and his work at Redeemer Presbyterian Church, you can check out his personal website, his Facebook page or the church homepage.
Keller, Timothy (2013), Walking with God Through Pain and Suffering. Penguin Group. ISBN 978-0-525-95245-9
Comments