Saturday, November 14, 2020

Is Abortion Right When Pregnancy Presents Risks to the Mother's Life?

 

In his helpful book Why Pro-Life? - Caring for the Unborn and their Mothers thoughtfully addresses this challenging question.  Due to the gravity of the question, I wanted to share his full response here:

Is abortion justified when a woman's life or health is threatened by pregnancy or childbirth?  And how often is that actually the case?

While he was US surgeon general, Dr. C. Everett Koop stated that in thirty-six years as a pediatric surgeon, he was never aware of a single situation in which a preborn child's life had to be taken in order to save the mother's life.  He said the use of this argument to justify abortion was "a smoke screen."

Dr. Landrum Shettles, pioneer in infertility treatment and called "the father of in vitro fertilization," claimed that less than 1 percent of all abortions were performed to save the mother's life. (With medical science continually improving, surely the likelihood today is no greater than it was nineteen years ago.)

Save The Life That Can Be Saved

A woman with toxemia will have adverse health reactions and considerable inconvenience, including probably needing to lie down for much of her pregnancy.  This is difficult, but normally not life-threatening.  In such cases, abortion for the sake of "health" would not be lifesaving but life-taking.

At times it is pregnancy itself-because of routine medical appointments and tests-which may serve as a catalyst for discovering an otherwise undetected illness.  But serious illnesses that may rarely occur during a pregnancy can still be treated to protect the mother and her baby.  Breast cancer is identified in about one out of every three thousand pregnancies and is usually entirely treatable.

Cancer [of any type] during pregnancy is rare, occurring in approximately one out of every 1,000 pregnancies...However, a pregnant woman with cancer is capable of giving birth to a healthy baby, and some cancer treatments are safe during pregnancy.  Cancer rarely affects the fetus directly.  Although some cancers may spread to the placenta (a temporary organ that connects the mother and fetus), most cancers cannot spread to the fetus itself.

Dr. John Crown, an oncologist, who has treated women who are pregnant and discover they have cancer, told his Twitter followers he has never had a case where abortion was necessary to save the mother's life.  He writes,

What I say to most patients is, "I know this sounds like the worst thing that could happen but there is a high chance you are going to get two happy outcomes here: you will be cured and the baby will be born normal.  That is the most likely outcome..."

Though more prevalent in postmenopausal women, if the mother has a fast-spreading uterine cancer, treatment to save the mother can place the baby's life at risk.  Certainly, surgery to remove the cancer may result in the unintended loss of the child's life.

Friends of ours were faced with a situation where removing the mother's life-threatening and rapidly spreading cancer would, unintentionally yet inevitably, result in their unborn child's death.  The pregnancy was so early that there wasn't time for the child to develop sufficiently to live outside the womb before both mother and child would die.  The surgery was performed to remove the cancer.

But this was in no sense an abortion.  The surgery's purpose wasn't to kill the child but to save the mother.  The death of the child was a tragic side-effect of lifesaving efforts.  This was a consistently pro-life act, since to be pro-life does not mean being pro-life only about babies.  It also means being pro-life about women.

Ectopic Pregnancy

Ectopic pregnancies, when gestation takes place outside the uterus, account for an estimated 2 percent of all pregnancies.  Most commonly, implantation begins in a fallopian tube but occasionally on an ovary or against or against the abdominal wall.  Usually the pregnancy miscarries without a woman knowing she was pregnant.  

According to pro-choice advocates, "Without a doubt, the most frequently presented example of a case in which the mother's life may be in danger if an abortion is not performed is the case of an ectopic pregnancy."

But because of the nature of an ectopic pregnancy, the child would normally have no hope of survival.  And surgery may be necessary to save his mother.  These are tragic situations, but once again they are not the intentional killing of an innocent person who could otherwise survive.  In those instances in which both lives are at risk, and when the death of the unborn child occurs in the effort to keep the mother alive, one life saved is clearly better than two lives lost.

Abortion's Role in Ectopic Pregnancies

The US Department of Health and Human Services conducted a twenty-year study on ectopic pregnancy rates which indicated an increase of more than 500 percent since abortion was legalized.

Pro-choice advocates rightly point out that "the most frequently presented example of a case in which the mother's life may be in danger if an abortion is not performed is the case of an ectopic pregnancy.

I object to the term abortion in this context, but there is another issue.  According to a 2011 report in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, pregnancies identified as "ectopic" or "tubal" are incorrectly diagnosed an estimated 40 percent of the time.

Some have assumed that the increase of chemical abortions should substantially decrease the rate of ectopic pregnancy.  But a 2009 study concluded there may be "a trend toward increasing ectopic pregnancy rates over a recent 15-year period.

Past studies show that the risk of an ectopic pregnancy is twice as high for women who have had one abortion, and up to four times as high for women with two or more previous abortions.

While abortion is advocated to protect the health of women, studies show consistently that abortion has placed women at greater risk of ectopic pregnancy, by far the greatest pregnancy-related threat to their lives.

If you are interesting in receiving a free copy of Pro-Life by Randy Alcorn, please email us at truthbombapologetics@gmail.com.  This offer stands while supplies last.1

Courage and Godspeed,
Chad

Footnote:
1. Randy Alcorn, Why Pro-Life? - Caring for the Unborn and their Mothers, p. 79-81; sources used by Alcorn are available upon request.

Related Posts

Sunday, October 18, 2020

Tips for Memorizing and Using John 1 to Share the Truth- Cold Case Christianity Broadcast

 How can we better memorize this iconic chapter from John’s gospel? How can we use this important chapter to help make a case for the deity of Jesus? J. Warner offers tips to help you memorize and use scripture to share the Gospel with others in this episode of the NRBtv Cold-Case Christianity Broadcast.




God Bless

Wednesday, September 16, 2020

The Question of Excellence

"The question of excellence inevitably involves a consideration of the standards required to evaluate what is good, and this leads to profound questions about the essential nature and purpose of human life. It is precisely at this point that modern society reveals its moral confusion. Because we have abandoned the concept of absolute divine standards, moral statements have been reduced to mere preferences.  The result is moral statements which lack any real content.  Obviously, a society which lacks any supreme values other than those of pluralism and moral relativism will find it almost impossible to rouse itself to the pursuit of excellence.  What cannot be defined cannot be readily pursued!"


Gary Inrig: A Call to Excellence- Understanding Excellence God's Way

Thursday, August 20, 2020

Video- On Behalf of a Molinist Perspective by William Lane Craig



A great talk here by Dr. William Lane Craig on Molinism.  The Q and A is quite fun as well!

Enjoy!

Courage and Godspeed,
Chad

Related Post

Video: What is Molinism?

Tuesday, August 18, 2020

Why Philosophical Proofs for God Are Better Than “Scientific” Proofs by Brian Huffling

Here is a great article by philosopher Brian Huffling.  One of the most interesting parts are his comments about whether or not the question of God's existence is a scientific one. 

He writes:

The question of God’s existence is inherently philosophical. But is it a “scientific” question as well? Yes, in a way. I have used the word ‘scientific’ in quotes for a reason. Historically, following Aristotle, a discipline was considered scientific if it could demonstrate its conclusions through a rational process (logical argumentation) and from first principles (such as the law of non-contradiction). If such a demonstration could take place, that is, if there was a rational move from premises to a conclusion and the body of knowledge could be arranged systematically along with this demonstration, the body of knowledge was said to be scientific. Since philosophy can demonstrate its conclusions from rational demonstration, historically it has been thought to be scientific (as was theology . . . the queen of the sciences). However, the notion of something being scientific nowadays usually means that it is identical with natural science. Further, many think that science is the only domain that provides knowledge. This view is called ‘scientism’. Notice that the claim that “only science conveys knowledge” is a philosophical claim, not a claim demonstrated by natural science. It is a claim about the nature of science (philosophy of science) and the nature of knowledge (epistemology). In short, since philosophy is a science in this broader sense, the issue of God’s existence is a scientific one, just not in the sense of the natural sciences.

Checkout the entire article here.

You can find more of Huffling's work here.

Courage and Godspeed,
Chad

Related Posts

Book Preview: Scientism and Secularism by J.P. Moreland

Article: What is Thomism? by gotQuestions.org

What is Philosophy?

Should Christians Not Study Philosophy?

Sunday, August 16, 2020

Review of J.L. Schellenberg, "Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason," by Daniel Howard-Snyder

Philosopher Daniel Howard-Snyder reviews J.L. Schellenberg's Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason here.

Philosopher Randal Rauser also has a thoughtful review of Schellenberg's work, The Hiddenness Argumenthere.  Schellenberg responds to Rauser here.

Courage and Godspeed,
Chad

Related Posts

Video: Why Does God Seem So Hidden? by Sean McDowell

R. Douglas Geivett on the Hiddenness of God

Why Does God Hide?