There is a basic skeleton of facts the movie gets correct: Alan Turing was homosexual; his work in
mathematics and cryptography were instrumental in the development of the
machines that cracked the Nazi code and led to modern computers; he was engaged to Joan Clark; his home
was burglarized; he was convicted of indecency and sentenced to “chemical
castration.”
Unfortunately, the movie includes a great deal of
fiction: Alan Turing was open about his
homosexuality; Joan Clark knew of his attraction to men; their engagement was not to rescue
her from her conservative parents, they genuinely liked each other; he was
not a brusque, humorless, narcissist; he did not singlehandedly design and build
the machine; he did not name any of the machines he built “Christopher”; and he
most certainly would not have committed treason to keep secret his proclivity that was not so secret.
The ultimate point of the film, on which the power of its propaganda
rests, is that Alan Turing committed suicide because of the suffering he endured due to
his sentence. While the determination
that his death was a suicide is itself questionable, he died a full 14 months
after his treatments, not while enduring them as the film depicts.
These inaccuracies and many more can be found at these
articles at history vs hollywood, the guardian and slate. While I understand that film makers often add
fictional aspects to historical events for powerful dramatic effect, i.e. Jack and Rose in "Titanic", I do wish they would take better care to get the historical
data right. With a generation that gets
it’s truth in 30 second bites, objective truth will be lost to slickly produced
images and special effects.
Don’t take my word for it – read the articles, don’t trust
the movie.
Have a little hope on me,
Roger
Comments