In the genre of apologetic writings, it can be difficult to
find new books that aren’t covering the same set of arguments in slightly
various ways. While this is not bad in itself – most offer fresh angles and
insights into the same “old” arguments – The Story of Reality is a breath of
fresh air. Often when reading, I find I hear the voice of the author speaking
the text in my head because the writing style parallels the authors speaking
style. Such was not the case with this. However Greg Koukl devised to write
this text, it is a uniquely fresh and enjoyable read. It covers a lot of ground
in a thorough yet winsome way. The arguments are basic and clear without getting
bogged down in details.
My only caveat is his assertion that every worldview has
four elements: creation, fall, redemption and restoration. I’m not sure many
atheists or agnostics would agree that the elements after “creation” are a part of “reality”.
What I would like to do is share some “clips” of
what I thought were his more significant thoughts concerning God’s Wrath, The
Trade and Perfect Justice, some of the more controversial aspects that are
unique to the Christian story.
Wrath
It is hard to imagine anything in religion more repugnant to
people than the wrath of God. And it’s easy to see why.
First, God’s wrath is unsettling when we are the ones
standing in the dock. Law abiding citizens do not object when criminals pay their
due. Only the felon finds fault. Second, we are so well acquainted with our own
failures that familiarity has largely removed any deep sense of their gravity.
We are inclined to consider ourselves as, generally speaking, basically good
folk.
The notion of a “vengeful” God strikes us as inconsistent
with a God of love.
“Why doesn’t God do something?” we wonder. Yet we cry foul
when we learn God will do something decisive about evil and we are the evil
doers.
God would not be good if he truly hated evil but was benign
toward those who consistently cause it. Justice means exacting an appropriate
payment for a crime. No payment, no justice. No justice, no goodness. Is God
“vengeful”? No more than any good, fair, noble, just judge who must pass
sentence on lawbreakers. (97)
The Trade
Each of the dead is judged by his own behavior, not by
comparing one person with another but simply by a raw accounting of each
person’s conduct recorded in books for all to see. Every misdeed has been
logged, every sin has been written down, and every careless word has been
noted.
If God is good, he must punish the guilty, and if he is good
he can only punish the guilty.
None will find safe harbor in his own merit since all things
hidden will be revealed. In the final reckoning, every man will be shown to be
a debtor to God – something each of us already knows deep in our own hearts.
Before the white throne, each person who is judged by his
own behavior is found guilty, the record in the books silencing every appeal.
It will be clear to all that God is justified when he speaks and blameless when
he judges. The books leave no room for debate, no ground for petition or plea.
When a debt was owed in the first century, a “certificate”
of debt was made. When the obligation was settled, it was officially resolved
with a single Greek word placed upon the parchment’s face: tetelestai.
When Jesus dies on the cross, when the full payment is made,
when the last of the debt of those who trust him melts away, when the justice
of God is fully satisfied, Jesus simply dismisses his spirit into the Father’s
hand and dies. But before he does, a single word falls from his lips. It is the
word tetelestai - “It is finished.”
His goal has been reached; his task has been achieved. The divine transaction
is complete. Jesus takes our guilt. We take his goodness. Theologians use terms
like justification or substitution or redemption or propitiation. We will
simply call it what Christians of the past have called it, the “Marvelous
Exchange”. (127-129)
Perfect Justice
How is an eternal hell an example of a loving God? Hell is
not an example of God’s love. It is an example of his justice. His love is
demonstrated by his free offer of pardon from hell, which many decline. But
they will not be able to decline his justice.
If God simply let wicked people go free, then he would not
be good at all. And if he were not good, it is very difficult to see how he
could be loving. Since God’s love and justice are both good things, they are
not in conflict with each other.
If you still insist that a loving God would never send
anyone to hell, then you must settle in your mind that desperately evil acts
will forever remain unpunished. Yet isn’t part of our complaint about evil that
evil people get away with the evil they have done? Have you thought about what
that would mean?
There is no contradiction between God’s love, which is
wonderful, and God’s justice, which is terrifying. I want you to see that they
come together in a breathtaking way when his love and his justice and his mercy
all converge at a cross. (162-163)
So is Mr. Koukl right? Do the puzzle pieces fit? Does the
Christian world view tell the “true” Story of Reality? Don’t take my word for it, check it out for yourself, read the book, don’t wait for the movie.
Have a little hope on me, Roger
Koukl, G. (2017). The
Story of Reality. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
Comments
I think that even an atheistic worldview could have views on fall, redemption, and restoration, even if the worldview does not use that terminology.
Fall = a way to distinguish identify the not-good from the good, i.e., a moral view. This is often present implicitly in the worldviews that deny the existence of any true morality; for those worldviews, the not-good might be trust in God ("the opiate of the masses"), etc.
Redemption = Whatever good can be salvaged from the not-good. In a materialistic worldview, the rise of science out of a religious culture would be an example of redemption.
Restoration = a path for reducing the not-good and increasing the good. In a materialistic worldview, the path might be science.*
Does that make sense? Does Koukl propose something like that in his taxonomy of worldviews?
Thanks!
Chris Falter
* Note that I do not dispute the value of science as an aspect of what God calls us to do as those who are made in His image. I only dispute that the view that science is the sole or even dominant path to restoration.