Sunday, March 28, 2021

Dr. Charles Stanley- The Foreknowledge of God

The Foreknowledge of God -: Predestination. Election. Foreknowledge. These teachings have been the topics of seemingly endless debate and even disagreements among God’s people. But what do these words mean? And do they matter outside a seminary classroom? The points and counterpoints about what God knows, whom He chooses, and what man decides, are all very complex. In this message, Dr. Stanley helps us examine some key truths from Scripture about God’s foreknowledge and its relationship to predestination, election, and salvation.

Monday, February 15, 2021

3 Reasons Relativism is Untenable

Relativism, broadly defined, is the view that truth is relative to each individual and that there is no objective truth.  According to this type of thinking, objective truth is not attainable, and therefore, all truth claims are equally valid.  Thankfully, among serious thinkers, this view seems to have fallen out of favor.  However, relativistic thinking is still quite common in everyday conversations.  This type of thinking manifests itself when someone says something like, "That may be true for you, but it's not true for me."1

In his book 5 Minute Apologist, Rick Cornish points out 3 reasons why relativism is, at the end of the day, untenable.  He writes:

"First, it defeats itself.  The relativist believes the statement, 'All truth is relative.'  But if all truth is relative, then relativism falls into that category and cannot claim to be...true.  Why, then, should we believe it?

Second, relativism is untenable because it entails that opposites are true.  For example, some might assert that it can be true for one person that God exists, but true for another that He does not exist.  Those two concepts, however, are mutually exclusive.  It cannot be the case that God both exists and does not exist.  Either He does or does not.

Third, the relativist view renders knowledge impossible.  Gaining knowledge presupposes moving from a state of no-knowledge to a state of knowledge.  If relativism is true, however, neither state truly exists, and learning is rendered impossible."

Cornish concludes:

"Despite the recent popularity of relativism, it lacks intellectual, philosophical and biblical integrity. As Christians we must recognize and understand it.  We swim in its waters, and should be able to refute it as we engage our culture with the gospel of Christ.  The One who said, 'I am the way the truth and the life' (John 14:6, emphasis added), requires that we know the nature of truth and communicate it well."3

I wholeheartedly concur. 

For those who want to learn more about the challenge of relativism and be better equipped to combat it, I recommend Francis Beckwith and Greg Koukl's book Relativism: Feet Firmly Planted in Mid-Air.

Courage and Godspeed,

1. Which is just a fancy way of saying, "Nothing is true for everybody.  And that is true...for everybody!"
2. Rick Cornish, 5 Minute Apologist, p. 31.
3. Ibid., p. 32.

Related Posts

Philosopher Stephen T. Davis on Tolerance

Seven Things You Can't Do As A Relativist by Greg Koukl

Relativism by Greg Koukl MP3 Audio

Monday, February 08, 2021

Debate Video - Is Christianity Dangerous? Michael Jones (Inspiring Philosophy) vs. Dr. Michael Shermer

This is simply the best debate I have heard on this topic.  The next time someone tries to convince you that Christianity is dangerous or that Christianity has negative consequences, this is the debate to share with them!

Further, both men were charitable, kind and knowledgable.  We need more debates like this one.  


Courage and Godspeed,

Video: The Ontological Argument (The Introduction)

Monday, January 25, 2021

Christians and Conspiracy Theories: Have We Lost our Minds?

Shortly after the attack on the US Capital, a close friend sent me the following text:

"Not sure if you are experiencing similar things with people (mostly Christian), but it seems like there is a lot of hysteria and conspiracy theories being tossed around about what is going to happen over the next week or so.  I am honestly finding it very frustrating because it just seems people are taking things and running with them as if they are true, without really taking the time to check sources or see if it makes sense."

My friend's frustration is certainly understandable when one considers that Christians are supposed to be proclaimers and lovers of truth and abstain from falsehoods.1  But if this is indeed the case, then why are so many Christians taken in by conspiracies?  I fear that what we are witnessing is the rotten fruit of anti-intellectualism within the evangelical church. 

In his book Love God with all Your Mind, philosopher J.P. Moreland explains that "it is safe to say that from the arrival of the Pilgrims to the middle of the nineteenth century, American believers prized the intellectual life for its contribution to the Christian journey.  The Puritans were highly educated people (the literacy rate for men in early Massachusetts and Connecticut was between 89 and 95 percent) who founded colleges, taught their children to read and write before the age of six, and studied art, science, philosophy, and other fields as a way of loving God with the mind.  Scholars like Jonathan Edwards were activists who sought to be scholarly and well informed in a variety of disciplines.  The minister was an intellectual, as well as spiritual, authority in the community."2.   However, this is clearly no longer the case.  To a large degree, American evangelicalism has strayed from the Scriptures, church history, common sense and its rich intellectual heritage. 

So, how did we get here?  How have we gone from being a thoughtful, intellectually vibrant people to those who are sometimes quick to believe conspiracies and falsehoods?  Moreland explains that "[i]n the middle 1800s...things began to change dramatically, though the seeds for the change had already been planted in the popularized, rhetorically powerful, and emotionally directed preaching of George Whitefield in the the First Great Awakening in the United States from the 1730s to the 1750s.  During the middle 1800s, three awakenings broke out in the United States: the Second Great Awakening (1800-1820), the revivals of Charles Finney (1824-1837), and the Layman's Prayer Revival (1856-1858).  Much good came from these movements.  But their overall effect was to overemphasize immediate personal conversion to Christ instead of a studied period of reflection and conviction; emotional, simple, popular preaching instead of intellectually careful and doctrinally precise sermons; and personal feelings and relationship to Christ instead of a deep grasp of the nature of Christian teaching and ideas.  Sadly, as historian George Marsden notes, 'anti-intellectualism was a feature of American revivalism."3.   And, while Moreland is clear that there was nothing wrong with emphasizing  personal conversion, he argues that the emphasis on personal feelings and emotions resulted in an "intellectually shallow, theologically illiterate form of Christianity."4

When the church as whole walks away from its rich intellectual heritage, and begins to emphasis emotions and personal experience over the life of the mind (Matt. 22:37) and intellectually careful and precise sermons,  the result is what we are seeing today.  And a people who do not value evidence-based beliefs will quickly be taken in by falsehoods.

We must find our way back.  Dr. Moreland argues that the evangelical church must "move toward a clearer, more biblical understanding of the Christian mind and how Christ Himself wants to shape our thinking...As disciples of Jesus Christ, we must ask how we can become the kind of people we need to be to bring honor to Christ, to help turn the culture toward Him, and to be lights in the midst of darkness for our families, friends, churches and communities...We must rededicate ourselves to being deeply spiritual of whom it can truly be said that 'Christ is formed in you' (Galatians 4:19).  And, given the times in which we live, we must also obey Jesus' admonition to be as 'wise as serpents, and harmless as doves (Matthew 10:16, KJV)."5

Surely the reasons people are quick to believe conspiracy theories are multi-faceted and my goal is not to oversimplify, but to perhaps identify one of the root problems.  While this post may not offer a complete answer, hopefully it serves as the beginning of one.  

I am encouraged by the many Christians I know that represent a studying, learning community that values the life of the mind.  But we have a long way to go.  We must learn to think well again.  We must return to our rich intellectual heritage and take seriously the words of the Apostle Paul:

"Therefore, having put away falsehood, let each one of you speak the truth with his neighbor..." (Ephesians 4:25).  

Courage and Godspeed,

1. John 4:24, 1 Cor. 13:4-6, Ephesians 4:15; 4:25
2. J.P. Moreland, Love Your God with All Your Mind: Revised and Updated, p. 16,
3. Ibid.
4. Ibid., 16-17.
5. Ibid., 19; 40.

Related Posts

5 Theses on Anti-Intellectualism by Justin Taylor

Video: Loving God with All Your Mind by J.P. Moreland

What Are the Laws of Logic? by J.P. Moreland

Wednesday, January 13, 2021

Book Preview: Return of the God Hypothesis by Dr. Stephen C. Meyer

About the Author

Stephen C. Meyer received his Ph.D. in the philosophy of science from the University of Cambridge. A former geophysicist and college professor, he now directs Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture in Seattle. He has authored the New York Times best seller Darwin’s Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design (HarperOne, 2013), Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design (HarperOne, 2009), which was named a Book of the Year by the Times (of London) Literary Supplement in 2009, and now, The Return of the God Hypothesis (HarperOne, 2021).

About the Book

The New York Times bestselling author of Darwin’s Doubt and Intelligent Design scholar presents groundbreaking scientific evidence of the existence of God, based on breakthroughs in physics, cosmology, and biology.

In 2004, Stephen C. Meyer, one of the preeminent scientists studying the origins of life, ignited a firestorm of media and scientific controversy when a biology journal at the Smithsonian Institution published his peer-reviewed article advancing the theory of Intelligent Design. Then, in his two bestselling books, Signature in the Cell and Darwin’s Doubt, he helped unravel a mystery that Charles Darwin did not address: how did life begin? and offered further scientific proof to bolster his arguments on the history of life and our origins, concluding that life was designed.

In those previous books, Meyer purposely refrained from attempting to answer questions about “who” might have designed life. Now, in The Return of the God Hypothesis, he brings his ideas full circle, providing a reasoned and evidence-based answer to the ultimate mystery of the universe, drawn from recent scientific discoveries in physics, cosmology, and biology.

Meyer uses three scientific points to refute popular arguments put forward by the “New Atheists” against the existence of God:

- The evidence from cosmology showing that the material universe had a beginning.
- The evidence from physics showing that, from the beginning, the universe was been “finely tuned” to allow for the possibility of life.
- The evidence from biology showing that since the universe came into being, large amounts of genetic information present in DNA must have arisen to make life possible.

In analyzing the evidence from these three fields, Meyer reveals how the data support not just the existence of an intelligent designer of some kind—but the existence of a theistic creator.

To learn more about Dr. Meyer's forthcoming book, and take advantage of the Preorder Special Offer, go here.

Courage and Godspeed,

Related Posts

What is Intelligent Design? by Dr. Stephen C. Meyer

Ben Shapiro Interviews Dr. Stephen Meyer

Video: Theistic Evolution by Stephen Meyer

Tuesday, January 05, 2021

Philosopher Richard Swinburne on the Multi-verse


"To postulate a trillion-trillion other universes, rather than one God, in order to explain the orderliness of our universe, seems the height of irrationality."1

Courage and Godspeed,

1. Richard Swinburne, Is There a God?, p. 68 as quoted by Peter S. Williams in Outgrowing God?

Related Posts

Article: Can Multiverse Theories Explain the Appearance of Fine Tuning in the Universe? by J. Warner Wallace

Video: Origins of the Universe- Has Hawking Eliminated God? with Dr. William Lane Craig and Dr. Rodney Holder

Multiverse Theory, The Anthropic Principle and Vampires

Friday, January 01, 2021

A.W. Tozer on the New Year

"I do not advise that we end the year on a somber note. The march, not the dirge, has ever been the music of Christianity. If we are good students in the school of life, there is much that the years have to teach us. But the Christian is more than a student, more than a philosopher. He is a believer, and the object of his faith makes the difference, the mighty difference. Of all persons the Christian should be best prepared for whatever the New Year brings. He has dealt with life at its source. In Christ he has disposed of a thousand enemies that other men must face alone and unprepared. He can face his tomorrow cheerful and unafraid because yesterday he turned his feet into the ways of peace and today he lives in God. The man who has made God his dwelling place will always have a safe habitation."1

Happy New Year!

Courage and Godspeed,

1. A.W. Tozer, The Warfare of the Spirit.